Uczące się przyszłe mamy (szkoła, studia itp.) | Forum o ciąży

Witajcie czy są wśród nas uczące się przyszłe mamusie? Czy macie jakieś problemy? np. z nauką czy dyrekcją? Jakie podejmujecie decyzje?

witam 🙂 ja jestem obecnie na 2 roku studiow 🙂czy bede miec problemy to sie dop okaze po rozmowie z dziekanem:P musze przesunac praktyki poniewaz mam czas do konca 2 roku...a ze jestem obecnie na L4 to nie moge nigdzie indziej podpisywac zadnej umowy...mam nadzieje ze dziekan pojdzie mi na reke..

Ja w maju mam mature a na początku czerwca termin bedzie śmiesznie jeśli zaczne rodzić na ustnej :P (tylko szkoda zawalić wtedy matury :/) szczerze bardzo się boje bo juz na początku mam bardzo dużo zaległości a co bedzie potem... dyrekcja jeszcze chyba nic nie wie ale wychowawczynia i kilka nauczycielek głupio jest się usprawiedliwiać często tym że jest się w ciąży bo to nie choroba ale czasem naprawdę ciężko nauczyć sie na coś jeśli śpi się po szkole wstaje coś zjeść wykąpac się i dalej spać... Mam nadzieję że uda mi się wytrwać i zdać do kwietnia...

Ja jestem teraz na 3 roku studiów, mam do napisania prace licencjacką nie wiem jak to będzie przy malutkiej ale napewno wszystko się dobrze ułoży trzeba myśleć pozytywnie.

Cześć.
Megulka dasz sobie spokojnie rade! Tylko spokojnie i rozsądnie. Ja miałam termin na 03.06 a obrone wyznaczoną na 12.07. Ostatecznie urodziłam 27.05, dokończyłam prace, obroniłam się. Dacie sobie rade. Na początku są luzy. Dziecko tylko spi je kupki strzela i tak wkółko 🙂 więc jest czas na wszystko 🙂 Powodzenia Wam życze

Ja 31.08. mialam termin, a 1.09 egzamin wstepny na studia mgr 🙂)

Jak sie okazalo 1.09 o 14 bylam juz w szpitalu, a egzamin pisalam z peknietym pecherzem w gornym biegunie..)
Ale moja corunia mpozwolila mi napisac egzamin i poczekala...
Obecnie nadusia ma 2 miesiace, a ja studiuje magisterke na poloznictwie dziennie.. gdyby nie moja mama na pewno byloby bardzo ciezko, bo Nadulek niestety nie nalezy do dzieci, ktore robia kupki, jedza i spia...

Ale dasz rade.. najwazniejsze sa checi!!!

　　 History examines the manifestations of man's free will in connection with the external world in time and in dependence on cause, that is, it defines this freedom by the laws of reason, and so history is a science only in so far as this free will is defined by those laws.
World of Warcraft power leveling
　　The recognition of man's free will as something capable of influencing historical events, that is, as not subject to laws, is the same for history as the recognition of a free force moving the heavenly bodies would be for astronomy.
　　That assumption would destroy the possibility of the existence of laws, that is, of any science whatever. If there is even a single body moving freely, then the laws of Kepler and Newton are negatived and no conception of the movement of the heavenly bodies any longer exists. If any single action is due to free will, then not a single historical law can exist, nor any conception of historical events.
replica rolex
　　For history, lines exist of the movement of human wills, one end of which is hidden in the unknown but at the other end of which a consciousness of man's will in the present moves in space, time, and dependence on cause.
　　The more this field of motion spreads out before our eyes, the more evident are the laws of that movement. To discover and define those laws is the problem of history.
replica rolex
　　From the standpoint from which the science of history now regards its subject on the path it now follows, seeking the causes of events in man's freewill, a scientific enunciation of those laws is impossible, for however man's free will may be restricted, as soon as we recognize it as a force not subject to law, the existence of law becomes impossible.
replica rolex
　　Only by reducing this element of free will to the infinitesimal, that is, by regarding it as an infinitely small quantity, can we convince ourselves of the absolute inaccessibility of the causes, and then instead of seeking causes, history will take the discovery of laws as its problem.
replica rolex
　　The search for these laws has long been begun and the new methods of thought which history must adopt are being worked out simultaneously with the self-destruction toward which- ever dissecting and dissecting the causes of phenomena- the old method of history is moving.
wedding dress
　　All human sciences have traveled along that path. Arriving at infinitesimals, mathematics, the most exact of sciences, abandons the process of analysis and enters on the new process of the integration of unknown, infinitely small, quantities. Abandoning the conception of cause, mathematics seeks law, that is, the property common to all unknown, infinitely small, elements.
　　In another form but along the same path of reflection the other sciences have proceeded. When Newton enunciated the law of gravity he did not say that the sun or the earth had a property of attraction; he said that all bodies from the largest to the smallest have the property of attracting one another, that is, leaving aside the question of the cause of the movement of the bodies, he expressed the property common to all bodies from the infinitely large to the infinitely small. The same is done by the natural sciences: leaving aside the question of cause, they seek for laws. History stands on the same path. And if history has for its object the study of the movement of the nations and of humanity and not the narration of episodes in the lives of individuals, it too, setting aside the conception of cause, should seek the laws common to all the inseparably interconnected infinitesimal elements of free will.

　　 From the time the law of Copernicus was discovered and proved, the mere recognition of the fact that it was not the sun but the earth that moves sufficed to destroy the whole cosmography of the ancients. By disproving that law it might have been possible to retain the old conception of the movements of the bodies, but without disproving it, it would seem impossible to continue studying the Ptolemaic worlds. But even after the discovery of the law of Copernicus the Ptolemaic worlds were still studied for a long time.
world of warcraft power leveling
　　From the time the first person said and proved that the number of births or of crimes is subject to mathematical laws, and that this or that mode of government is determined by certain geographical and economic conditions, and that certain relations of population to soil produce migrations of peoples, the foundations on which history had been built were destroyed in their essence.
world of warcraft gold
　　By refuting these new laws the former view of history might have been retained; but without refuting them it would seem impossible to continue studying historic events as the results of man's free will. For if a certain mode of government was established or certain migrations of peoples took place in consequence of such and such geographic,
replica rolex
ethnographic, or economic conditions, then the free will of those individuals who appear to us to have established that mode of government or occasioned the migrations can no longer be regarded as the cause.
　　And yet the former history continues to be studied side by side with the laws of statistics, geography, political economy, comparative philology, and geology, which directly contradict its assumptions.
wedding dress
　　The struggle between the old views and the new was long and stubbornly fought out in physical philosophy. Theology stood on guard for the old views and accused the new of violating revelation. But when truth conquered, theology established itself just as firmly on the new foundation.
replica watches
　　Just as prolonged and stubborn is the struggle now proceeding between the old and the new conception of history, and theology in the same way stands on guard for the old view, and accuses the new view of subverting revelation.
　　In the one case as in the other, on both sides the struggle provokes passion and stifles truth. On the one hand there is fear and regret for the loss of the whole edifice constructed through the ages, on the other is the passion for destruction.
World of Warcraft power leveling
　　To the men who fought against the rising truths of physical philosophy, it seemed that if they admitted that truth it would destroy faith in God, in the creation of the firmament, and in the miracle of Joshua the son of Nun. To the defenders of the laws of Copernicus and Newton, to Voltaire for example, it seemed that the laws of astronomy destroyed religion, and he utilized the law of gravitation as a weapon against religion.
　　Just so it now seems as if we have only to admit the law of inevitability, to destroy the conception of the soul, of good and evil, and all the institutions of state and church that have been built up on those conceptions.
　　So too, like Voltaire in his time, uninvited defenders of the law of inevitability today use that law as a weapon against religion, though the law of inevitability in history, like the law of Copernicus in astronomy, far from destroying, even strengthens the foundation on which the institutions of state and church are erected.
　　As in the question of astronomy then, so in the question of history now, the whole difference of opinion is based on the recognition or nonrecognition of something absolute, serving as the measure of visible phenomena. In astronomy it was the immovability of the earth, in history it is the independence of personality- free will.
　　As with astronomy the difficulty of recognizing the motion of the earth lay in abandoning the immediate sensation of the earth's fixity and of the motion of the planets, so in history the difficulty of recognizing the subjection of personality to the laws of space, time, and cause lies in renouncing the direct feeling of the independence of one's own personality. But as in astronomy the new view said: "It is true that we do not feel the movement of the earth, but by admitting its immobility we arrive at absurdity, while by admitting its motion (which we do not feel) we arrive at laws," so also in history the new view says: "It is true that we are not conscious of our dependence, but by admitting our free will we arrive at absurdity, while by admitting our dependence on the external world, on time, and on cause, we arrive at laws."

Zuziek powinnaś porozmawiać z dyrekcją szkoły. Uświadomić ich co się dzieje. Inaczej póki wszystko nie stanie się "widoczne" mogą na Ciebie krzywo patrzeć i wyrabiać sobie o Tobie złe zdanie, na podstawie Twych słabszych wyników. A tak to być może ograniczą Ci materiał do ilości koniecznej i będzie Ci łatwiej.

Megulka ja mam podobnie... Tzn. jestem po trzecim roku, teraz ustaliłam z opiekunką rok przerwy, w między czasie postaram się napisać i obronić pracę. W ciąży było mi ciężko, choć zaliczyłam jakoś przedmioty, etc. Została już tylko ta praca. Mam nadzieję, że dam radę, mimo, że będę miała jeszcze na głowie maluszka. 😉

Ja trzy dni temu skończyłam pisać mgr, więc obronę już pewnie z małą na ramieniu będę miała... 🙂 W trakcie studiów zero problemów ze strony prowadzących. Na drugim kierunku, który dopiero podjęłam też luz -dali indywidualna organizację zajęć, trochę przymykają oko na nieobecności, ograniczają materiał i są skłonni przepisywać zaliczenia z poprzednich studiów.

Tylko że studia to co innego, niż liceum... Tam nie patrzą takim przychylnym okiem na młode mamy... Cała moja rodzina siedzi w szkolnictwie, więc wiem jak to wygląda - przynajmniej w naszych stronach... Szkoda, że tacy mało wyrozumiali, zakompleksieni i zacofani ludzie są odpowiedzialni za kształcenie i wychowywanie kolejnych ludzi. Oczywiście generalizuję zwracając honor tym, którzy postępują inaczej...

Pozdrawiam wszystkie młode mamusie! Nie dajcie się zwariować - macie prawo walczyć i domagać się ustępstw! 🙂

Ja w czerwcu broniłam licencjat, w sierpniu urodziłam Grzesia, a od października chodzę na studia magisterskie zaoczne. Nie jest źle 🙂 babcie chętnie z wnukiem zostają a ja mam parę godzin by wyrwać się od małego. Nie wiem jak to będzie podczas sesji, ale jestem dobrej myśli 🙂